About

I'm a senior software engineer who has spent years on both sides of the interview table — writing code at companies like Meta, Amazon, Apple, and Google, and sitting in the interviewer's seat for 100+ engineering candidates. I've also built the kind of hiring and recruiting software that these processes run on, so I've seen how candidates are actually evaluated, not just how the advice blogs say they are.

Here's the thing almost nobody tells you: the behavioral interview isn't a personality test, and it isn't a chance to show how technically deep you can go. It's a structured evaluation of whether you've had — and can clearly communicate — impact at the level you're interviewing for. Most strong engineers fail it not because they lack the impact, but because they bury it under technical narration and collective “we,” and never translate it into what an interviewer can score.

This tool is the distilled version of the feedback I give engineers one story at a time. It reads what you wrote, tells you where an interviewer would stop scoring, and pushes you to surface the impact that's already there. It won't write your stories for you — that's the one thing that doesn't work. It makes your stories land.